Skip to Content

College tuition is too high: cut the bloat, cut the cost

Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail

 

andrewIt’s hard to believe I’ve almost finished my first year of medical school here at USA.

I’ve had the opportunity to learn anatomy, biochemistry, physiology, histology and a million other things over these past two semesters. I never knew I would actually be able to fit that much information inside my brain.

My only regret is it cost me $24,000 in tuition to do it. Every student here at USA and other universities across the country has had to face the harsh reality of rising college tuition.

We had an increase last year, and more than likely we will have an increase this year.

In times like these, the first question students should ask is, “Why are costs going up in the first place?”

To answer this, I’d first like to mention a few statistics. Between 1975 and 2005, the total spending on higher education tripled to $325 billion a year.

Medical education alone has grown 450 percent. During the same time period, the student to teacher ratio remained the same. However, the real growth was in administration and support staff. By 2005, there were 1.2 non-teaching employees per every one teacher.

The spending on administrative cost increased 235 percent while teaching cost only increased 128 percent.

Unfortunately, USA has not escaped this trend. A visit to the administrative department page on USA’s website shows a list of 53 departments. A visit to the academic department page yielded a list of 53 academic departments amongst the ten colleges that make up the university.

When you have such a bloated bureaucracy as to have one administrative department for every academic it’s no wonder the cost are high.

The medical school alone has 11 deans or assistant deans for a group of less than 300 medical students.

The second question to ask is, “Why doesn’t the University cut back?”

The simple answer is that those in charge simply don’t feel the need to stop leeching money from us and the feds. With grants and loan money backed by the US government, the administration sees no need to cut back wasteful growth.

Many experts are calling this the “Higher Education Bubble.”

The bad debt on college loans could become as much of a problem as the housing crash.

I, and many others, argue that if guaranteed federal funding was taken away and the market was allowed to dictate cost, college tuition would fall dramatically. In short, costs always go up when the federal government subsidizes something.

In medicine, the feds are now subsidizing electronic medical records. The result: bad EMRs that can cost over $50,000 for a small physician’s office.

The federal government financed Cash for Clunkers. The result: used car prices are at record highs.

The same trend can be seen for solar power and ethanol.

To conclude, I often ask myself if the education I received this year was worth the $24,000 I paid at 7.9 percent interest.

Besides the humbling experience of the gross anatomy lab, it’s extremely difficult to say that it was.

With the increase in technology and information on the Internet, everything I learned outside of lab I could have done for free.

This is the final question we should ask all ourselves.

When we have the ability to share a limitless amount of knowledge with each other across the internet, what is it that justifies the high cost?

Comments  

 
+24 #1 12345 2012-05-06 22:25
As a medical student who has been here longer than Mr. Schneider, I believe he has a fundamental lack of understanding of the purpose and cost of medical school training. The cost of putting a student through the 1st two years of medical school is relatively low; however, Mr. Schneider shows his crippling lack of foresight in failing to consider the cost of years 3 & 4. The Med Center operates at a loss every year, because its patient population is largely uninsured -- a trade-off, as we are asking patients to allow young and inexperienced students to be partially responsible for their lives. However, the hospital must still maintain high levels of malpractice insurance, as any mistake a student makes counts against whichever physician is responsible for them. These are the true costs of a med school. Mr. Schneider might think twice about so quickly criticizing something with which he seems to have little experience.
 
 
+22 #2 Maverick 2012-05-06 23:26
As another medical student who has been here longer than Mr. Schneider, I am perhaps in a better position to understand the absolute ludicrousness of trying to learn everything taught in the first two years of medical school. So please, let us not even jest about attempting to decipher which facts are relevant and contemporary, and which are irrelevant and outdated by depending on the vast, and infamously misinformed, tomes of the internet as our sole source of information. While information on the internet is often (but not always) free, it holds true in this case as it does in many others that you get what you pay for. I am humble enough to realize that I could never have done this without my professors, and I am sure that the author of this piece will learn the same in due time. Perhaps if Mr. Schneider is so short-sighted that he cannot see that the rewards of knowledge and the joy of helping patients are worth the monetary sacrifice, he should find a less altruistic profession.
 
 
+26 #3 Medical Student 2012-05-07 11:48
It is disappointing that one of our peers would choose to disrespect his teachers and colleagues with this short-sighted critique of South’s medical school. The very professors who the author feels are no more qualified than the internet to teach are among the leaders in their fields; they contribute to our dynamic understanding of the human body and the treatment of diseases that afflict it. In other words, they are publishing the papers and contributing to the texts from which the author seems to feel one best learns. I personally find it very useful to learn from them directly, but I suppose I cannot argue with the author’s personal choice on the matter. I want the students of South to realize that our 11 deans are not sitting in a board room, smoking cigars, drinking brandy, and getting fat off our tuition. Many are physicians who work in the hospital, course directors, or researchers in funded labs. They merely take on extra duties in an attempt to improve the author’s education.
 
 
+18 #4 CuatroCinco 2012-05-07 21:10
The federal government also subsidizes residency programs, allowing them to pay their residents' salaries. Do you plan on obtaining a residency position in a few years? Yes? Then you will benefit from this. Without that financial assistance, hospitals (like USA) which operate on amazingly tight, or negative, margins would not be able to train residents. In case you aren't following, that means our country would cease to produce new doctors. That doesn't seem like a good thing.

Furthermore, student loans aren't subsidized anymore, stud. The federal government LOANS your tuition money to you, interest starts snowballing immediately, and they demand that you pay it back once you start making money. If that still offends you, don't participate.

Finally, comparing your education at USACOM to "the Internet" is shameful. I defy you to drop out now, save your money, learn it all "for free," and try to hold a candle to a USA student. At this point, what's stopping you?
 
 
+15 #5 xoxoxo 2012-05-07 21:20
You say often ask yourself "if the education I received this year was worth the $24,000 I paid at 7.9 percent interest." I think the majority of medical students (including myself and ones paying MUCH more for the same education elsewhere) would say YES. If you are unsure about your answer to this question, you should seriously reconsider the profession you are getting yourself into.

A spot in an accredited U.S. medical school is not something you should feel so entitled to. Do you realize how many people out there would gladly pay above and beyond that amount of money to be in your shoes?
 
 
-2 #6 The Wee Baby Seamus 2012-05-07 21:56
I feel like most of the commenters above latched on to two sentences in this opinion and missed the overall point. As yet another med student who has been here longer than Mr. Schneider, give the guy a break. He isn't short sighted; he's asking valid questions that more people should be asking. He wasn't attacking South's med school or faculty specifically, but commenting on the price of higher education in general, which is an inflated mess. The amount of bureaucracy is a joke, and even within the med school, there are things that could be done more efficiently. That being said though, I have enjoyed my experience at South Alabama and I am proud of the education we are receiving.
 
 
+16 #7 KC 2012-05-08 07:43
I could suggest fallacies in this shortsighted article but I think previous commenters have done quite a good job. But in response to "The Wee Baby Seamus" (excellent reference) I will simply say - one could 'give the guy a break' in that it is not unreasonable to suggest the burgeoning cost of medical education and the bureaucratic increases should be examined, I think most of us take exception to the aspersions cast on an excellent faculty and exceptionally helpful staff. The idea that our administrators "simply don’t feel the need to stop leeching money from us" is an absurd one and beneath the rhetoric of a professional school student.
 
 
+16 #8 Maverick 2012-05-08 10:05
Precisely, KC. I appreciate the original intent (I think) of this opinion and am myself troubled by the rising costs of education in this country, but as KC pointed out, unprofessional and disrespectful statements of the sort thrown about so casually in this article destroy any credibility in the author's point. And Wee Baby Seamus, I disagree with your assessment that this opinion is not shortsighted. I feel 12345 and CuatroCinco did an excellent job of showing that. Also, if you take into account the fact that Mr. Schneider obviously did not foresee the fallout to his professional reputation that lambasting our education in such a manner will have with anyone reading this, including those 11 deans and his future attendings, I believe it is very difficult to say his vision is anything but shortsighted.
 
 
+12 #9 John 2012-05-08 15:37
Mr. Schneider, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
 
 
+11 #10 The Cremaster Debator 2012-05-09 12:23
Although the original contributor's intentions seemingly meant well, there are several choice phrases he decided to employ which could easily be misconstrued as "lacking tact". And in the field of medicine, being tactful & knowing when to keep quiet & pick your own battles is a disciplined art. It's clear that he is trying to make a point more on the overall exponentially increasing costs of higher education, & he states a viewpoint which is more or less anti-government (& all too trendy in the world today), but it's the tone with which he comes down on his own personal institution which some might find incendiary. There are around 1200 aspiring & hopeful students who apply to the University of South Alabama College of Medicine each year, of which maybe around 10% get accepted & 5% actually end up attending. I'm confident the other 90% would kill to have the opportunity he has, & wouldn't consider it a "waste" & something one could just teach themselves through the magic of Wikipedia.
 

Please login or register to post comments.

Written by Andrew Scheider | Contributing Writer

Blogs

Vanguard reactions to surveillance tape

The Vanguard's Cassie Fambro (Editor-in-Chief), Noah Logan (Opinion Editor), and JT Crabtree (Left of Center Editor) were able to view the surveillance tape of the events leading up to the shooting of Gil Collar. Read their reactions. 

More...

Summer Issues

The next issues of The Vanguard will be published on June 4th and July 9th. Weekly printing will resume when the Fall semester begins.

More...

SGA News

SGA Presidential Candidate Accused of Lying About Membership in Student Organization

More...

The SGA Debate: Candidate Forum 2012

The SGA candidate forum held April 2, in the library proved to have its share of highlights. With Elections Committee Chair Danny Nguyen moderating, the forum took on a new format compared to years past.

More...

The Vanguard on Twitter

We've joined Twitter. @thevanguardusa is the place. Follow us, and we will follow back! Spread the word. We will update breaking news, sports, weather alerts and more.

More...

Weather

 

Current Edition PDF